Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. May 21, 2019
  2. May 07, 2019
  3. Apr 01, 2019
  4. Mar 28, 2019
  5. Mar 22, 2019
  6. Mar 19, 2019
  7. Feb 27, 2019
    • Giovanni Bussi's avatar
      Removed duplicates keywords · 8ed9697a
      Giovanni Bussi authored
      Can be found with the following python snippet
      
      import re
      plumedDictionary={}
      with open("/opt/local/lib/plumed/vim/syntax/plumed.vim") as fin:
          for line in fin:
              if re.match("^let b:plumedDictionary\[.*$",line):
                  line=re.sub("^let b:","",line)
                  exec(line,{'__builtins__': None},{'plumedDictionary':plumedDictionary})
      for key in plumedDictionary.keys():
          diction={}
          for opt in plumedDictionary[key]:
              if(opt['word'] in diction):
                  print(key,opt['word'])
              diction[opt['word']]=1
      8ed9697a
  8. Feb 21, 2019
  9. Jan 21, 2019
  10. Jan 14, 2019
  11. Jan 11, 2019
  12. Dec 19, 2018
  13. Dec 18, 2018
  14. Dec 17, 2018
    • Giovanni Bussi's avatar
      Merge branch 'v2.3' into v2.4 · f84f2ceb
      Giovanni Bussi authored
      f84f2ceb
    • Giovanni Bussi's avatar
      changelog · 145e8e73
      Giovanni Bussi authored
      145e8e73
    • Giovanni Bussi's avatar
      fixed regtests · 6f3fd373
      Giovanni Bussi authored
      See #399
      6f3fd373
    • fiskissimo's avatar
      Fix: Segmentation fault whenever more than 2 CVs are used for METAD with REWEIGHTING_NGRID #328 · 4f709055
      fiskissimo authored
      I tried to interpret and fix the code and for me it works nicely with 1 to 3 CVs.
      Here a brief description: the index i spans through the whole reweghting-grid (according to the mpi rank in case of mpi).
      rewf_grid_ contains the size on each dimension of the reweghting-grid. t_index is the array containing the coordinates of i in each dimension of the grid. The indexes had to be changed from i to j in line 1967, which indeed spans correctly the dimensions of the grid. In 1968 in order to get the correct index, we need to subtract the former index (ncv-2 -- instead of "ncv-1" which is yet not assigned -- from what is left of kk).
      
      I didn't attempt any further test.
      
      Please let me know if I had misinterpreted the code.
      
      Fixes #399
      4f709055
Loading